↓ Skip to main content

Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication.

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication.
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 1996
DOI 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7131
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In wild-type diploid cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, an HO endonuclease-induced double-strand break (DSB) at the MAT locus can be efficiently repaired by gene conversion using the homologous chromosome sequences. Repair of the broken chromosome was nearly eliminated in rad52delta diploids; 99% lost the broken chromosome. However, in rad51delta diploids, the broken chromosomes were repaired approximately 35% of the time. None of these repair events were simple gene conversions or gene conversions with an associated crossover, instead, they created diploids homozygous for the MAT locus and all markers in the 100-kb region distal to the site of the DSB. In rad51delta diploids, the broken chromosome can apparently be inherited for several generations, as many of these repair events are found as sectored colonies, with one part being repaired and the other part being lost the broken chromosome. Similar events occur in about 2% of wild-type cells. We propose that a broken chromosome end can invade a homologous template in the absence of RAD51 and initiate DNA replication that may extend to the telomere, 100 or more kb away. Such break-induced replication appears to be similar to recombination-initiated replication in bacteria.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 175 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 33%
Researcher 32 18%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 27 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 27 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2000.
All research outputs
#12,344,996
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#83,657
of 118,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,930
of 40,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#355
of 529 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 529 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.