↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional expression of Shaker K+ channels in cultured Drosophila "giant" neurons derived from Sh cDNA transformants: distinct properties, distribution, and turnover
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, February 1995
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.15-02-01406.1995
Pubmed ID
Authors

ML Zhao, EO Sable, LE Iverson, CF Wu

Abstract

Expression of transgenic Shaker (Sh) channels has not previously been examined in Drosophila neurons. We studied K+ current by whole-cell recording in cultured "giant" neurons derived from germline transformants. Independent lines were generated by using a P-element vector, in which transcription of the 29-4 cDNA, one of the Sh splicing variants (Iverson and Rudy, 1990), was under the control of a heat shock (HS)-inducible promoter. Transformants in wild-type and two different Sh mutant backgrounds all exhibited an HS-inducible, A-type K+ current that was characterized by a much slower recovery from inactivation and a higher sensitivity to 4-aminopyridine than native K+ currents of Sh 29-4 currents expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Despite similarities in the kinetic and pharmacological properties of the HS-induced current in all backgrounds examined, host-dependent differences in the peak current amplitude have been consistently observed between multiple lines of 29-4 ShM and 29-4 Sh120 that might reflect differential channel subunit assembly in different hosts. Isolation of the novel 29-4 currents allowed determination of the channel turnover rate in cultured neurons. These currents persisted for up to 3 d or more, comparable with the durations previously reported for Na+ and Ca2+ channels. Surprisingly, the percentage of cells expressing inactivating K+ currents remained approximately the same with or without HS induction, suggesting that some mechanisms exist to restrict functional expression of inactivating K+ channels, including transgenic Sh channels and those not encoded by the Sh locus, to certain types of neurons.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 40%
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 53%
Neuroscience 4 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2025.
All research outputs
#12,356,702
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#13,285
of 23,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,190
of 111,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#37
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.