↓ Skip to main content

Developing a Safer Conception Intervention for Men Living with HIV in South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Developing a Safer Conception Intervention for Men Living with HIV in South Africa
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10461-017-1719-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Within sexual partnerships, men make many decisions about sexual behavior, reproductive goals, and HIV prevention. There are increasing calls to involve men in reproductive health and HIV prevention. This paper describes the process of creating and evaluating the acceptability of a safer conception intervention for men living with HIV who want to have children with partners at risk for acquiring HIV in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Based on formative work conducted with men and women living with HIV, their partners, and providers, we developed an intervention based on principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy to support men in the adoption of HIV risk-reduction behaviors such as HIV-serostatus disclosure and uptake of and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Structured group discussions were used to explore intervention acceptability and feasibility. Our work demonstrates that men are eager for reproductive health services, but face unique barriers to accessing them.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 15%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 40 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 17%
Social Sciences 15 12%
Psychology 6 5%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 38 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2018.
All research outputs
#21,490,139
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#3,151
of 3,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,618
of 438,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#74
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.