↓ Skip to main content

Classification and Microvascular Flap Selection for Anterior Cranial Fossa Reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Classification and Microvascular Flap Selection for Anterior Cranial Fossa Reconstruction
Published in
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, May 2018
DOI 10.1055/s-0038-1649520
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

 Microvascular reconstruction of the anterior cranial fossa (ACF) creates difficult challenges. Reconstructive goals and flap selection vary based on the defect location within the ACF. This study evaluates the feasibility and reliability of free tissue transfer for salvage reconstruction of low, middle, and high ACF defects.  A retrospective review was performed. Reconstructions were anatomically classified as low (anterior skull base), middle (frontal bar/sinus), and high (frontal bone/soft tissue). Subjects were evaluated based on pathologic indication and goal, type of flap used, and complications observed.  Eleven flaps in 10 subjects were identified and anatomic sites included: low (n = 5), middle (n = 3), and high (n = 3). Eight of 11 reconstructions utilized osteocutaneous flaps including the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFFF) (n = 7) and fibula (n = 1). Other reconstructions included a split calvarial graft wrapped within a temporoparietal fascia free flap (n = 1), latissimus myocutaneous flap (n = 1), and rectus abdominis myofascial flap (n = 1). All 11 flaps were successful without microvascular compromise. No complications were observed in the high and middle ACF defect groups. Two of five flaps in the low defect group using OCRFFF flaps failed to achieve surgical goals despite demonstrating healthy flaps upon re-exploration. Complications included persistent cerebrospinal fluid leak (n = 1) and pneumocephalus (n = 1), requiring flap repositioning in one subject and a second microvascular flap in the second subject to achieve surgical goals.  In our experience, osteocutaneous flaps (especially the OCRFFF) are preferred for complete autologous reconstruction of high and middle ACF defects. Low skull base defects are more difficult to reconstruct, and consideration of free muscle flaps (no bone) should be weighed as an option in this anatomic area.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,494,940
of 23,058,939 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
#345
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,003
of 329,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
#12
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,058,939 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.