↓ Skip to main content

Stress-related changes to immune cells in the skin prior to wounding may impair subsequent healing

Overview of attention for article published in Brain, Behavior & Immunity, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stress-related changes to immune cells in the skin prior to wounding may impair subsequent healing
Published in
Brain, Behavior & Immunity, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.06.011
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Higher psychological stress is associated with slower dermal wound healing, but the immunological mechanisms behind this effect are only partially understood. This paper aims to investigate whether immune cells present in the skin prior to wounding can affect subsequent healing in high-stress and low-stress participants. Two studies are presented in which skin biopsies were analysed using immunohistochemistry for numbers of macrophages and Langerhans cells, and immune cell activation (Study 2 only). Immune cells were related to perceived stress levels and subsequent healing. Study 1 included 19 healthy older adults and showed that higher stress was associated with significantly fewer macrophages in the skin. Study 2 included 22 younger adults and showed that higher stress was associated with significantly lower activation of immune cells in the skin. Furthermore, lower activation of immune cells (as measured by human leukocyte antigen (HLA expression)) and fewer Langerhans cells were associated with slower healing. Together these studies show the first preliminary evidence that the number and activation of immune cells in the skin prior to wounding are affected by stress and can impact healing. Larger studies are needed to confirm these effects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Professor 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Psychology 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2015.
All research outputs
#28,676,353
of 34,454,098 outputs
Outputs from Brain, Behavior & Immunity
#3,596
of 4,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,044
of 303,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain, Behavior & Immunity
#43
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,454,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.