↓ Skip to main content

The immediate early genes of human cytomegalovirus upregulate tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene expression.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, February 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The immediate early genes of human cytomegalovirus upregulate tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene expression.
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, February 1994
DOI 10.1172/jci116995
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important cause of disease in the immunocompromised patient and CMV infection is associated with predominantly mononuclear inflammatory response. Since products of the CMV immediate early (IE) gene region are potent trans-activators, we used the monocyte cell line THP-1 and a transient transfection assay to determine if these viral proteins upregulate expression of the TNF gene. The IE genes of CMV upregulated TNF gene activity as judged by increases in promoter activity, steady state mRNA, and protein production. The presence or absence of the 3' untranslated region of the TNF gene did not affect gene expression induced by the IE gene products. These studies suggest that activation of TNF gene expression by the CMV IE gene products may, in part, account for the inflammatory response associated with CMV infections.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2005.
All research outputs
#6,768,768
of 31,542,270 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#8,261
of 19,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,517
of 95,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#27
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,542,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.