Cognate soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins are now known to associate the secretory vesicle with both the target plasma membrane and Ca(2+) channels in order to mediate the sequence of events leading to exocytosis in neurons and neuroendocrine cells. Neuroendocrine cells, particularly insulin-secreting islet beta-cells, t-SNARE proteins, 25-kDa synaptosomal-associated protein (SNAP-25), and syntaxin 1A, independently inhibit the L-type Ca(2+) channel (L(Ca)). However, when both are present, they actually exhibit stimulatory actions on the L(Ca). This suggests that the positive regulation of the L(Ca) is conferred by a multi-SNARE protein complex. We hypothesized an alternate explanation, which is that each of these SNARE proteins possess distinct inhibitory and stimulatory domains that act on the L(Ca). These SNARE proteins were recently shown to bind the Lc(753-893) domain corresponding to the II and III intracellular loop of the alpha1C subunit of the L(Ca). In this study, using patch-clamp methods on primary pancreatic beta-cells and insulinoma HIT-T15 cells, we examined the functional interactions of the botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) cleavage products of SNAP-25, including NH(2)-terminal (1-197 amino acids) and COOH-terminal (amino acid 198-206) domains, on the L(Ca), particularly at the Lc(753-893) domain. Intracellular application of SNAP-25(1-206) in primary beta-cells decreased L(Ca) currents by approximately 15%. The reduction in L(Ca) currents was counteracted by coapplication of Lc(753-893). Overexpression or injection of wild-type SNAP-25 in HIT cells reduced L(Ca) currents by approximately 30%, and this inhibition was also blocked by the recombinant Lc(753-893) peptide. Expression of BoNT/A surprisingly caused an even greater reduction of L(Ca) currents (by 41%), suggesting that the BoNT/A cleavage products of SNAP-25 might possess distinct inhibitory and positive regulatory domains. Indeed, expression of SNAP-25(1-197) increased L(Ca) currents (by 19% at 10 mV), and these effects were blocked by the Lc(753-893) peptide. In contrast, injection of SNAP-25(198-206) peptide into untransfected cells inhibited L(Ca) currents (by 47%), and more remarkably, these inhibitory effects dominated over the stimulatory effects of SNAP-25(1-197) overexpression (by 34%). Therefore, the SNARE protein SNAP-25 possesses distinct inhibitory and stimulatory domains that act on the L(Ca). The COOH-terminal 197-206 domain of SNAP-25, whose inhibitory actions dominate over the opposing stimulatory NH(2)-terminal domain, likely confers the inhibitory actions of SNAP-25 on the L(Ca). We postulate that the eventual accelerated proteolysis of SNAP-25 brought about by BoNT/A cleavage allows the relatively intact NH(2)-terminal SNAP-25 domain to assert its stimulatory action on the L(Ca) to increase Ca(2+) influx, and this could in part explain the observed weak or inconsistent inhibitory effects of BoNT/A on insulin secretion. The present study suggests that distinct domains within SNAP-25 modulate L(C) subtype Ca(2+) channel activity in both primary beta-cells and insulinoma HIT-T15 cells.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2006.
All research outputs
#7,559,215
of 23,058,939 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes
#4,102
of 9,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,020
of 121,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes
#34
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,058,939 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
