↓ Skip to main content

Identification and Cloning of Differentially Expressed Genes by Long-Distance Differential Display

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical Biochemistry, June 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identification and Cloning of Differentially Expressed Genes by Long-Distance Differential Display
Published in
Analytical Biochemistry, June 1998
DOI 10.1006/abio.1998.2653
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Differential mRNA display (DD-PCR) amplifies short cDNAs (average size 100-350 bp), representing mainly the 3' untranslated regions (3' UTR) of transcripts. Sequencing of these cDNAs is predominantly uninformative for prediction of function and selection of clones for further analysis. Differential display of longer amplicons (0.5-2.0 kb) could enable isolation of cDNAs that encompass both 3' UTR and at least part of the 3' end of the coding region. The coding sequence information could facilitate selection of candidate clones for further analysis without the necessity of screening cDNA libraries. By combining DD-PCR protocols with long-distance PCR and using hot-start PCR with rTth DNA polymerase we have successfully amplified and comparatively displayed cDNAs ranging in size from 150 bp to 2 kb. Long-distance DD-PCR (LDD-PCR) has generated highly reproducible primer-specific patterns of cDNA fragments, as well as reproducible duplicate fingerprints, obtained from different RNA and cDNA samples. Sequencing and expression analyses of LDD-PCR clones have shown that LDD-PCR (a) enables nonredundant clone sampling, (b) generates many clones that encompass part of the coding region, and (c) samples both abundant and rare transcripts, approximately 60% of which are differentially expressed as confirmed by Northern analysis. Coupled with high-throughput cDNA sequencing and multiplex hybridization of cDNA microarrays for confirmation of differential expression, LDD-PCR could prove to be useful for simultaneous scanning of transcripts from multiple cDNA samples and faster selection of differentially expressed transcripts of interest.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Professor 2 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2007.
All research outputs
#9,514,662
of 27,776,330 outputs
Outputs from Analytical Biochemistry
#3,097
of 8,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,833
of 37,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical Biochemistry
#20
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,776,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,746 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.