↓ Skip to main content

Building Advanced Surgical Capacity at a Hospital in Port-au-Prince, Haiti

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Building Advanced Surgical Capacity at a Hospital in Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Published in
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, June 2015
DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000001678
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To improve surgical capacity in developing countries, we must take a multifaceted approach that addresses all aspects of surgery in a hospital. Foreign non-governmental organizations with expertise and resources can play a role in helping to build surgical capacity in developing countries. Episodic surgical missions can contribute to reducing the burden of the disease, but must be coupled with training of local staff to assure capacity for the future. Lack of human resources and proper infrastructure should be addressed as part of the capacity-building process. Longitudinal educational programs improve the training of local staff over time. Scaling up from episodic surgical trips to building and maintaining fully functioning surgical capacity requires sustained and repeated interventions from a large group of stakeholders. Through partnerships with local government and nongovernmental organizations, each partner can amplify the effectiveness of the other to meet the challenges of complex surgical care in low-resource settings.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2025.
All research outputs
#7,552,564
of 28,890,729 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
#214
of 4,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,318
of 286,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
#6
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,890,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,817 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.