↓ Skip to main content

Expression of Polymorphic msp1β Genes during Acute Anaplasma marginale Rickettsemia

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Immunity, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Expression of Polymorphic msp1β Genes during Acute Anaplasma marginale Rickettsemia
Published in
Infection and Immunity, April 2000
DOI 10.1128/iai.68.4.1946-1952.2000
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Immunization of cattle with native MSP1 induces protection against Anaplasma marginale. The native immunogen is composed of a single MSP1a protein and multiple, undefined MSP1b polypeptides. In addition to the originally sequenced gene, designated msp1beta(F1), we identified three complete msp1beta genes in the Florida strain: msp1beta(F2), msp1beta(F3), and msp1beta(F4). Each of these polymorphic genes encodes a structurally unique MSP1b protein, and unique transcripts can be identified during acute A. marginale rickettsemia. The structural polymorphism is clustered in discrete variable regions, and each MSP1b protein results from a unique mosaic of five variable regions. Although each of the MSP1b proteins in the Florida strain contains epitopes recognized by serum antibody induced by protective immunization with the native MSP1 complex, the variable regions also include epitopes expressed by some but not all of the MSP1b proteins. These data support testing recombinant vaccines composed of the multiple antigenically and structurally unique MSP1b proteins combined with MSP1a in order to mimic the efficacy of native MSP1 immunization.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 35%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2005.
All research outputs
#7,405,506
of 34,043,423 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Immunity
#3,993
of 16,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,503
of 59,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Immunity
#54
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,043,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.