From a review of the single peer reviewed published report and the brief preliminary studies presented in abstract form, the BARD EndoCinch procedure seems safe and demonstrates an acceptable efficacy for symptom control during short-term follow-up. Most patients (about 2 out of 3) do well with improvement of GERD symptoms during the first post-procedural year. This benefit may wane over time. Objective benefit is lacking with the minority of treated individuals achieving normalization of 24-hour total acid exposure, and no significant effect has been seen in healing of esophagitis. This may focus the treatment towards that group of GERD patients with mild or non-erosive disease. The authors have no information that the endoscopic therapy could prevent reflux-related complications, and long-term data is awaited from accumulated clinical experience to establish the maintenance profile of this novel treatment. The outcomes from the sham trial, and long-term follow-up data will help to define the role of this anti-reflux therapy. The authors need additional studies to define the effect of endoluminal plication on the function of the lower esophageal sphincter to optimize its benefit for patients.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,358,651
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America
#228
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,446
of 191,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.
