↓ Skip to main content

Expression of Functional Soluble Human α-Globin Chains of Hemoglobin in Bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Protein Expression & Purification, October 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Expression of Functional Soluble Human α-Globin Chains of Hemoglobin in Bacteria
Published in
Protein Expression & Purification, October 2000
DOI 10.1006/prep.2000.1277
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Individual, soluble human alpha-globin chains were expressed in bacteria with exogenous heme and methionine aminopeptidase. The yields of soluble alpha chains in bacteria were comparable to those of recombinant non-alpha chains expressed under the same conditions. Molecular mass and gel-filtration properties of purified recombinant alpha chains were the same as those of authentic human alpha chains. Biochemical and biophysical properties of isolated alpha chains were identical to those of native human alpha chains as assessed by UV/vis, circular dichroism (CD), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy which contrasts with previous results of refolded precipitated alpha chains made in the presence of heme in vitro (M. T. Sanna et al., J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3478-3486, 1997). Mixtures of purified, soluble recombinant alpha-globin and native beta-globin chains formed heterotetramers in vitro, and oxygen- and CO-binding properties as well as the heme environment of the assembled tetramers were experimentally indistinguishable from those of native human Hb A. UV/vis, CD, and NMR spectra of assembled Hb A were also the same as those of human Hb A. These results indicate that individual expressed alpha chains are stable in bacteria and fold properly in vivo and that they then can assemble with free beta chains to form hemoglobin heterotetramers in vivo as well as in vitro.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 13%
Materials Science 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2026.
All research outputs
#12,344,472
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Protein Expression & Purification
#1,514
of 3,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,089
of 57,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein Expression & Purification
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.