↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stable Expression of the Alkaline Phosphatase Marker Gene by Neural Cells in Culture and after Transplantation into the CNS Using Cells Derived from a Transgenic Rat
Published in
Experimental Neurology, March 2002
DOI 10.1006/exnr.2001.7847
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Multipotent stem cells and more developmentally restricted precursors have previously been isolated from the developing nervous system and their properties analyzed by culture assays in vitro and by transplantation in vivo. However, the variety of labeling techniques that have been used to identify grafted cells in vivo have been unsatisfactory. In this article we describe the characteristics of cells isolated from a transgenic rat in which the marker gene human placental alkaline phosphatase (hPAP) is linked to the ubiquitously active R26 gene promoter. We show that hPAP is readily detected in embryonic neuroepithelial stem cells, neuronal-restricted precursor cells, and glial-restricted precursor cells. Transgene expression is robust and can be detected by both immunocytochemistry and histochemistry. Furthermore, the levels of hPAP on the cell surface are sufficient for live cell labeling and fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Expression of hPAP is stable in isolated cells in culture and in cells transplanted into the spinal cord for at least 1 month. We submit that cells isolated from this transgenic rat will be valuable for studies of neural development and regeneration.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 41%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 41%
Neuroscience 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2007.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Neurology
#1,465
of 4,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,431
of 55,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Neurology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.