↓ Skip to main content

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for High-Grade Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas

Overview of attention for article published in World Neurosurgery, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for High-Grade Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas
Published in
World Neurosurgery, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.062
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Factors associated with favorable outcome following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) with cortical venous reflux (CVR) are incompletely understood. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to assess the outcomes after SRS for high-grade DAVFs and identify predictors. We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients with high-grade DAVFs, defined as the presence of CVR, who underwent SRS between 1989 and 2017. The primary outcome was defined as DAVF obliteration without a new permanent neurological deficit. Predictors of outcomes were determined using multivariate logistic regression. The study cohort comprised 41 high-grade DAVF patients with a mean age of 52 years. DAVF obliteration without a new permanent neurological was achieved in 62% (13/21 patients). The rates of complete obliteration and new permanent neurological deficit were 63% (17/27 patients) and 23% (7/30 patients), respectively. No independent predictors of the primary outcome or angiographic obliteration were identified in the multivariate model. Presentation with a non-hemorrhagic neurological deficit (NHND) was found to be an independent predictor of a new permanent neurological deficit after SRS (OR=14.176 [1.119 - 179.540], p=0.041). Obliteration without a new permanent neurological deficit can be achieved in the majority of appropriately selected patients with high-grade DAVFs after treatment with SRS. NHND at presentation is a risk factor for new permanent neurological deficits after SRS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 25%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 55%
Unknown 9 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from World Neurosurgery
#5,801
of 7,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,982
of 342,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Neurosurgery
#176
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,047 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.