Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) are microscopic lesions which can be detected, after methylene blue staining, in the overtly normal looking colonic mucosa of cancer patients. ACF have been postulated to be precursor lesions which develop into colorectal cancer. Mutations of K-ras and p53 are two important genetic events implicated in colon carcinogenesis. Mutations in K-ras are detectable at earlier stages, while mutations in p53 are detectable at later stages of colon carcinogenesis. Our objective was to compare the nature of genetic alterations in K-ras (codon 12 and 13) and in p53 (exon 4-9) between ACF and corresponding colonic tumors from cancer patients. ACF with > or =20 crypts/focus were harvested from overtly normal looking colonic mucosa of cancer patients at a distance of (approx.) 5 cm from the site of colonic tumors. The colonic tumors and ACF samples were compared for K-ras codon 12 and 13 base pair sequence, using DNA sequencing and for p53 (exon 5-9) allelic types, using PCR-SSCP and DNA sequencing. The results demonstrated a perfect correlation in terms of the type of K-ras allele (wild or mutated) between the ACF (> or =20 crypts/focus) and corresponding colonic tumors in 11/13 cancer patients. Analyses of p53 mutations demonstrated the presence of p53 mutations in colonic carcinomas from 10/13 patients. However, p53 mutations could be detected in an ACF from only 1/13 patient. The results provides further evidence to the role of ACF as precursor to colon cancer. The presence of an identical K-ras as well as p53 mutation in an ACF and the corresponding colonic carcinoma in a patient suggests the possibility of existence of ACF that may be at a more advanced stage in the sequence of colonic tumorigenesis than others. In conclusion, the results suggest that a subset of ACF with higher multiplicity might be considered more likely to progress to more advanced lesions and should be explored as markers of colon cancer risk.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2010.
All research outputs
#9,516,022
of 27,783,697 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Letters
#2,130
of 6,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,487
of 33,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Letters
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,783,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,460 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
