Previous studies showed that neural progenitor cultures could be maintained without exogenously added FGF-2 when co-cultured with chromaffin cells. In addition, progenitor cells displayed dramatically increased neuronal differentiation in the presence of chromaffin cells. These findings suggested an approach to improved neural progenitor transplant outcomes using co-transplantation or administration of chromaffin cell-derived factors. The aim of this study was to determine whether the observed survival and differentiation effects were due to diffusible factors or required direct cell-cell contact (DC). Rat neural progenitors were cultured under six different conditions: (1) Standard N2 media with FGF-2; (2) N2 without FGF-2; (3) N2 with FGF+conditioned media (CM) from chromaffin cultures; (4) N2 without FGF-2+CM; (5) Transwells (TW), progenitor+chromaffin cells grown together but separated by a membrane allowing movement of diffusible agents but preventing direct contact; (6) direct contact co-cultures of progenitors and chromaffin cells. Cultures were evaluated for survival, proliferation, and differentiation. Cultures with FGF-2 proliferated and formed floating neurospheres while those grown in N2 without FGF-2 failed to thrive. Those grown either with CM or in transwells showed significantly improved survival. Survival was comparable to the exogenous FGF groups when progenitors were allowed direct contact with chromaffin cells. Proliferation was low in all cultures except those receiving exogenous FGF-2. Direct contact co-cultures exhibited a marked increase in beta-tubulin III+ processes compared to all other groups, indicating differentiation towards a neuronal phenotype. The results of this study suggest that diffusible agents produced by chromaffin cells can sustain viable progenitor cells in vitro even in the absence of added FGF-2 but that the effects on progenitor cell neuronal differentiation require direct cell-cell contact.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
1
7%
Medicine and Dentistry
1
7%
Other
1
7%
Unknown
2
13%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2009.
All research outputs
#9,515,628
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Brain Research
#59
of 261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,406
of 154,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Brain Research
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.
