↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High and low affinity receptors mediate growth effects of gastrin and gastrin‐Gly on DLD‐1 human colonic carcinoma cells
Published in
Febs Letters, December 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)01408-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Gastrin (G17) and N-carboxymethylgastrin (G17-Gly) have been shown to stimulate the growth of colon cancer cells both in vivo and in vitro. The identity of the receptor mediating these effects is controversial. A recent study demonstrated the presence of a low affinity binding site for G17 and G17-Gly on the DLD-1 human colon cancer cell line. The goal of the current study was to further investigate the role of this receptor in mediating the growth-promoting effects of gastrin peptides. Binding of [Leu(15)]G17 and [Leu(15)]G17-Gly to DLD-1 cell membranes in competition with [(3)H]G17-Gly was examined. Binding of [(3)H]cholecystokinin-8 (CCK8) to DLD-1 cell membranes was also assessed. Whole cell binding experiments were carried out using [(125)I-Tyr(12),Leu(15)]G17-Gly. In addition, the ability of [Leu(15)]G17 and [Leu(15)]G17-Gly to stimulate cell growth, as determined by cell counting, was tested. [Leu(15)]G17 and [Leu(15)]G17-Gly competed with [(3)H]G17-Gly at both a high and a low affinity site on DLD-1 membranes. The IC(50) values for [Leu(15)]G17 were 6.0 x 10(-8) M and 6.9 x 10(-6) M while those for [Leu(15)]G17-Gly were 3.2 x 10(-9) M and 4.9 x 10(-6) M. [(3)H]CCK8 did not bind to either site. [Leu(15)]G17-Gly also competed with [(125)I-Tyr(12),Leu(15)]G17-Gly at both a high and a low affinity site on DLD-1 cells with similar affinities as observed with membranes. [Leu(15)]G17 and [Leu(15)]G17-Gly significantly stimulated the growth of DLD-1 cells in a dose-dependent and biphasic manner. The binding profiles of the peptides tested suggest that these sites are different from previously identified wild-type and mutant CCK(1) or CCK(2) receptors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2012.
All research outputs
#12,344,472
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Febs Letters
#7,951
of 17,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,026
of 199,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Febs Letters
#61
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.