↓ Skip to main content

Resonant tunnelling in a quantum oxide superlattice

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Resonant tunnelling in a quantum oxide superlattice
Published in
Nature Communications, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms8424
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Resonant tunnelling is a quantum mechanical process that has long been attracting both scientific and technological attention owing to its intriguing underlying physics and unique applications for high-speed electronics. The materials system exhibiting resonant tunnelling, however, has been largely limited to the conventional semiconductors, partially due to their excellent crystalline quality. Here we show that a deliberately designed transition metal oxide superlattice exhibits a resonant tunnelling behaviour with a clear negative differential resistance. The tunnelling occurred through an atomically thin, lanthanum δ-doped SrTiO3 layer, and the negative differential resistance was realized on top of the bipolar resistance switching typically observed for perovskite oxide junctions. This combined process resulted in an extremely large resistance ratio (∼10(5)) between the high and low-resistance states. The unprecedentedly large control found in atomically thin δ-doped oxide superlattices can open a door to novel oxide-based high-frequency logic devices.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Vietnam 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 29 42%
Materials Science 14 20%
Engineering 7 10%
Chemistry 3 4%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,448,500
of 32,950,213 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#22,844
of 79,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,254
of 296,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#189
of 825 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,950,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 825 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.