↓ Skip to main content

Ubiquitous Transcriptional Pausing Is Independent of RNA Polymerase Backtracking

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ubiquitous Transcriptional Pausing Is Independent of RNA Polymerase Backtracking
Published in
Cell, November 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00845-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

RNA polymerase (RNAP) transcribes DNA discontinuously, with periods of rapid nucleotide addition punctuated by frequent pauses. We investigated the mechanism of transcription by measuring the effect of both hindering and assisting forces on the translocation of single Escherichia coli transcription elongation complexes, using an optical trapping apparatus that allows for the detection of pauses as short as one second. We found that the vast majority of pauses are brief (1-6 s at 21 degrees C, 1 mM NTPs), and that the probability of pausing at any particular position on a DNA template is low and fairly constant. Neither the probability nor the duration of these ubiquitous pauses was affected by hindering or assisting loads, establishing that they do not result from the backtracking of RNAP along the DNA template. We propose instead that they are caused by a structural rearrangement within the enzyme.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Japan 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 258 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 26%
Researcher 54 20%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Master 20 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 7%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 32 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 22%
Physics and Astronomy 41 15%
Chemistry 15 5%
Engineering 13 5%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 35 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2025.
All research outputs
#9,515,628
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#13,349
of 17,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,143
of 64,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#54
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.