↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Selective Insulin Signaling through A and B Insulin Receptors Regulates Transcription of Insulin and Glucokinase Genes in Pancreatic β Cells
Published in
Molecular Cell, March 2001
DOI 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00203-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Insulin signaling is mediated by a complex network of diverging and converging pathways, with alternative proteins and isoforms at almost every step in the process. We show here that insulin activates the transcription of its own gene and that of the beta cell glucokinase gene (betaGK) by different mechanisms. Whereas insulin gene transcription is promoted by signaling through insulin receptor A type (Ex11-), PI3K class Ia, and p70s6k, insulin stimulates the betaGK gene by signaling via insulin receptor B type (Ex11+), PI3K class II-like activity, and PKB (c-Akt). Our data provide evidence for selectivity in insulin action via the two isoforms of the insulin receptor, the molecular basis being preferential signaling through different PI3K and protein kinases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 109 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 28%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Chemistry 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 15 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,473,686
of 29,658,575 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cell
#3,672
of 8,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,525
of 50,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cell
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,658,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.