↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Postischemic Hypothermia and IL-10 Treatment Provide Long-Lasting Neuroprotection of CA1 Hippocampus Following Transient Global Ischemia in Rats
Published in
Experimental Neurology, August 1999
DOI 10.1006/exnr.1999.7115
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Experimental studies have demonstrated that postischemic therapeutic interventions may delay rather than provide long-lasting neuroprotection. The purpose of this study was to determine whether mild hypothermia (33-34 degrees C) combined with the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10) would protect the CA1 hippocampus 2 months after ischemia. Rats were subjected to 12.5 min of normothermic (37 degrees C) forebrain ischemia by two-vessel occlusion followed immediately by: (a) 4 h of normothermic (37 degrees C) reperfusion (n = 5); (b) 4 h of postischemic hypothermia (33-34 degrees C) (n = 5); (c) 4 h of normothermia plus IL-10 (5 micrograms) treatment 30 min after ischemia and at 3 days (n = 5); or (d) 4 h of hypothermia plus IL-10 treatment (n = 5). Rats survived for 2 months and were perfusion fixed for quantitative histopathological assessment of CA1 hippocampus. Postischemic normothermia and hypothermia, as well as normothermia plus IL-10 treatment led to severe damage of the CA1 hippocampus. In contrast, the combined treatment of hypothermia with IL-10 treatment improved overall neuronal survival by 49% compared to normothermic ischemia (P < 0.01). These data emphasize the detrimental consequences of secondary inflammatory responses on ischemic neuronal damage after transient global ischemia. In postinjury settings where restricted durations of mild hypothermia can be induced, anti-inflammatory treatments, including IL-10, may promote chronic neuroprotection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Professor 4 16%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#9,514,305
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Neurology
#1,465
of 4,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,596
of 39,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Neurology
#12
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.