↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional Value of the Aril of Trichilia cuneata, a Bird-Dispersed Fruit

Overview of attention for article published in Biotropica, March 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional Value of the Aril of Trichilia cuneata, a Bird-Dispersed Fruit
Published in
Biotropica, March 1983
DOI 10.2307/2387994
Authors

Mercedes S. Foster, Roy W. McDiarmid

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 7%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 4%
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 23 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 74%
Environmental Science 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2009.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Biotropica
#686
of 1,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,140
of 7,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotropica
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them