Bartter syndrome (BS) is a family of disorders manifested by hypokalemic hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis with normotensive hyperreninemic hyperaldosteronism. We evaluated a unique, inbred Bedouin kindred in which sensorineural deafness (SND) cosegregates with an infantile variant of the BS phenotype. Using a DNA-pooling strategy, we screened the human genome and successfully demonstrated linkage of this unique syndrome to chromosome 1p31. The genes for two kidney-specific chloride channels and a sodium/hydrogen antiporter, located near this region, were excluded as candidate genes. Although the search for the disease-causing gene in this family continues, this linkage further demonstrates the genetic heterogeneity of BS. In addition, the cosegregation of these phenotypes allows us to postulate that a single genetic alteration may be responsible for the SND and the BS phenotype. The identification and characterization of this gene would lead to a better understanding of the normal physiology of the kidney and the inner ear.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2007.
All research outputs
#12,357,273
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#5,139
of 7,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,619
of 133,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#39
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
