To use quantitative ultrasonographic measurements to compare the effect of a polymeric coating designed to increase needle echogenicity to commercially available needles.
Commercially available standard smooth and dimpled echogenic tip 21-gauge needles established reference levels of echogenicity in gelatin-based and turkey breast phantoms. Examples of both types of needles were coated with a thin polymeric film that utilizes entrapped microbubbles of air on its surface to increase echogenicity. Samples of each type in both coated and noncoated versions were placed in phantoms in matched positions and imaged with clinical ultrasound machines. Similar numbers of each category were evaluated at various angles of insonation for a total of 109 images. Similar numbers of each category were imaged at 5-minute intervals for up to 38 minutes for a total of 226 images. Images were recorded, digitized, and evaluated for relative echo strength in arbitrary echogenic brightness units.
Coating increased peak echogenicity over the entire needle to a level that closely approximates the peak echogenicity of dimpled needle tips (means: dimpled = 834, coated smooth = 803, coated dimpled = 823; P = .54). Smooth is lower than this group at 468 (P = .0001). Representative area echogenicity increased with coating or dimpling (smooth = 377 vs coated smooth = 778, coated dimpled = 690, dimpled = 775; P = .0001). Coating increased peak values 74% and area values 95% compared to smooth. Decreased angles of insonation moderately reduced echogenicity on coated smooth, coated dimpled, and dimpled, while it decreased to below good visibility threshold on standard smooth needles. The echogenicity of the coated needles fades in saline with time (1%/min).
Objective measurements show that this coating significantly increases echogenicity of entire needles to match that obtained with a dimpled tip.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2025.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
#2,342
of 4,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,456
of 47,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
