↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A simple method to transfer plasmid DNA into neuronal primary cultures: functional expression of the mGlu5 receptor in cerebellar granule cells
Published in
Neuropharmacology, June 1999
DOI 10.1016/s0028-3908(99)00005-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We describe a method to transfer cDNA into neuronal primary cultures with a commercialised cationic lipid, Transfast. Cultures were transfected at a rate of about 5% with green fluorescent protein (GFP) cDNA. Comparing Transfast to other transfection reagents, we found this compound to be the most efficient. GFP-transfected mouse cerebellar granule cells displayed normal whole-cell voltage-sensitive and unitary big K+ channel currents. We also used this transfection method with success to transfer GFP cDNA into primary cultures of striatum and colliculus. Transfast was then used to cotransfect cultured cerebellar cells with GFP cDNA, in conjunction with cDNA coding for the metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGlu5 receptor). Ninety percent of the cells expressing GFP also expressed mGlu5 receptor. Though neurones were best transfected one day after plating, they still expressed both GFP and mGlu5 receptor proteins 2 weeks after plating, i.e. after full differentiation. A functional test of the expressed mGlu5 receptor was thus performed in GFP-transfected neurones. Stimulation of mGlu5 receptor induced single big K+ channel activity, as it was the case for the native mGlu1 receptor. This indicated that the transfected mGlu5 receptor plasmid was functionally expressed and that both mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors may share common coupling mechanisms to big K+ channels in neurones.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 27%
Researcher 8 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Chemistry 5 17%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2009.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Neuropharmacology
#1,953
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,887
of 40,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropharmacology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.