Chronic pain is a complex and debilitating chronic health condition that negatively impacts a child's daily function. Previous investigations of coping behaviors in youth with chronic illness have suggested that secondary control/accommodative coping may be more adaptive than primary control/active coping or disengagement/passive coping. However, studies have not considered how pain intensity may change the effect of various coping strategies on functioning in this pediatric population. The current study examines how coping strategies relate to health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in youth with chronic pain at various levels of pain intensity.
Sixty-five children and adolescents, aged 8-18 (77% female: M=13.6years, SD=2.64) were recruited from a pediatric pain management clinic at an urban children's hospital. The Response to Stress Questionnaire examined coping behaviors of participants. The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales assessed HRQOL and a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale measured pain intensity.
Primary control engagement coping had a significant main effect to predict higher HRQOL. There was a significant interaction between secondary control engagement coping and pain, and a marginal interaction between disengagement coping and pain. Specifically, secondary control engagement coping significantly related to higher HRQOL when pain was low and disengagement coping marginally related to higher HRQOL when pain was high.
Findings suggest that the effectiveness of specific coping strategies may vary depending on a child's level of pain.
These findings suggest that clinicians (e.g., nurses, psychologists) use a more tailored approach when recommending interventions for managing chronic pain.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,541,990
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Nursing
#477
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,440
of 455,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Nursing
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
