↓ Skip to main content

Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) therapy induces CD8+ T cell responses in patients with multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) therapy induces CD8+ T cell responses in patients with multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, March 2002
DOI 10.1172/jci200214380
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nitin J. Karandikar, Michael P. Crawford, Xiao Yan, Robert B. Ratts, Jason M. Brenchley, David R. Ambrozak, Amy E. Lovett-Racke, Elliot M. Frohman, Peter Stastny, Daniel C. Douek, Richard A. Koup, Michael K. Racke

Abstract

Glatiramer acetate (GA; Copaxone) is a random copolymer of glutamic acid, lysine, alanine, and tyrosine that is used therapeutically in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). To investigate the mechanism of the drug's immunomodulatory effect, we used immunophenotypic approaches to characterize the precise nature of GA-induced T cell responses. We demonstrate here that healthy individuals and untreated MS patients exhibit prominent T cell proliferative responses to GA. However, these responses are different in distinct subsets of T cells. Whereas GA-induced CD4(+) T cell responses are comparable in healthy individuals and MS patients, CD8(+) T cell responses are significantly lower in untreated MS patients. Treatment with GA results in upregulation of these CD8(+) responses with restoration to levels observed in healthy individuals. Both CD4(+) and CD8(+) GA-specific responses are HLA-restricted. GA therapy also induces a change in the cytokine profile of GA-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. This study provides the first direct immunophenotypic evidence, to our knowledge, of GA-specific CD8(+) T cell responses and their upregulation during the course of therapy, which may suggest a role for these responses in the immunomodulatory effects of the drug.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 5 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Mathematics 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2013.
All research outputs
#11,233,499
of 31,883,038 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#12,534
of 19,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,993
of 65,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#62
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,883,038 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.