↓ Skip to main content

DNA recombination: the replication connection

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences, July 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
28 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
DNA recombination: the replication connection
Published in
Trends in Biochemical Sciences, July 1999
DOI 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01413-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs) arise after exposure to ionizing radiation or enzymatic cleavage, but especially during the process of DNA replication itself. Homologous recombination plays a critical role in repair of such DSBs. There has been significant progress in our understanding of two processes that occur in DSB repair: gene conversion and recombination-dependent DNA replication. Recent evidence suggests that gene conversion and break-induced replication are related processes that both begin with the establishment of a replication fork in which both leading- and lagging-strand synthesis occur. There has also been much progress in characterization of the biochemical roles of recombination proteins that are highly conserved from yeast to humans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
France 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 203 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 26%
Researcher 47 21%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Professor 14 6%
Student > Master 14 6%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 31 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 30 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2024.
All research outputs
#6,086,705
of 27,776,330 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biochemical Sciences
#859
of 2,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,639
of 39,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biochemical Sciences
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,776,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.