↓ Skip to main content

Epithelial attachment alters the outcome of Helicobacter pylori infection

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Epithelial attachment alters the outcome of Helicobacter pylori infection
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 1998
DOI 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3925
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Genetically defined in vivo models are needed to assess the importance of target cell attachment in bacterial pathogenesis. Gastric colonization by Helicobacter pylori in human populations is common and persistent, and has various outcomes including peptic ulcers and cancer. The impact of attachment on the course of infection was examined in transgenic mice expressing a human receptor for H. pylori in their gastric epithelium. Persistent infection by a clinical isolate occurred at comparable microbial densities in transgenic and nontransgenic littermates. However, microbial attachment in transgenic mice resulted in production of autoantibodies to Lewisx carbohydrate epitopes shared by bacteria and acid-secreting parietal cells, chronic gastritis, and parietal cell loss. This model should help identify bacterial and host genes that produce attachment-related pathology.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 22%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 12%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#7,633,119
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#63,594
of 119,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,755
of 48,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#269
of 586 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 586 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.