↓ Skip to main content

Radioimmunoassay for the Calcium Release Channel Agonist Ryanodine

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical Biochemistry, April 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Radioimmunoassay for the Calcium Release Channel Agonist Ryanodine
Published in
Analytical Biochemistry, April 1994
DOI 10.1006/abio.1994.1140
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A novel photo-activatable derivative of ryanodine, 9-hydroxy-21-(4-azidobenzoyloxy)-9-epiryanodine, has been synthesized and conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin for the production of antibodies with high affinity and specificity to ryanodine. The anti-ryanodine antibodies reacted specifically on immunoblots with the azido-ryanodine compound covalently conjugated to bovine serum albumin. A radioimmunoassay specific for ryanodine was developed using the anti-ryanodine antibodies, and a dissociation constant for ryanodine of 1 nM was determined. Half-maximal inhibition constants (IC50) for various ryanodine derivatives were found to range between 3.2 and 200 nM. These IC50 values correlated very well with the IC50 values obtained for the compounds binding to the skeletal muscle membrane receptor. These antibodies should be useful for the characterization of the ryanodine binding site on the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release channel.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 75%
Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,780,480
of 31,542,270 outputs
Outputs from Analytical Biochemistry
#1,573
of 9,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,606
of 29,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical Biochemistry
#16
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,542,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,897 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.