↓ Skip to main content

Recent development on computer aided tissue engineering — a review

Overview of attention for article published in Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recent development on computer aided tissue engineering — a review
Published in
Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine, February 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0169-2607(01)00116-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The utilization of computer-aided technologies in tissue engineering has evolved in the development of a new field of computer-aided tissue engineering (CATE). This article reviews recent development and application of enabling computer technology, imaging technology, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD and CAM), and rapid prototyping (RP) technology in tissue engineering, particularly, in computer-aided tissue anatomical modeling, three-dimensional (3-D) anatomy visualization and 3-D reconstruction, CAD-based anatomical modeling, computer-aided tissue classification, computer-aided tissue implantation and prototype modeling assisted surgical planning and reconstruction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 263 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 27%
Student > Master 52 19%
Researcher 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 43 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 110 40%
Materials Science 22 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 6%
Computer Science 11 4%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 56 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,591,124
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine
#447
of 2,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,185
of 185,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,710 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them