↓ Skip to main content

ASAP, a Novel Protein Complex Involved in RNA Processing and Apoptosis

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular & Cellular Biology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ASAP, a Novel Protein Complex Involved in RNA Processing and Apoptosis
Published in
Molecular & Cellular Biology, March 2023
DOI 10.1128/mcb.23.8.2981-2990.2003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Different isoforms of a protein complex termed the apoptosis- and splicing-associated protein (ASAP) were isolated from HeLa cell extract. ASAP complexes are composed of the polypeptides SAP18 and RNPS1 and different isoforms of the Acinus protein. While Acinus had previously been implicated in apoptosis and was recently identified as a component of the spliceosome, RNPS1 has been described as a general activator of RNA processing. Addition of ASAP isoforms to in vitro splicing reactions inhibits RNA processing mediated by ASF/SF2, by SC35, or by RNPS1. Additionally, microinjection of ASAP complexes into mammalian cells resulted in acceleration of cell death. Importantly, after induction of apoptosis the ASAP complex disassembles. Taken together, our results suggest an important role for the ASAP complexes in linking RNA processing and apoptosis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 99 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Student > Master 15 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 33%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,140,275
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Molecular & Cellular Biology
#1,302
of 14,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,502
of 449,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular & Cellular Biology
#1,005
of 10,453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10,453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.