↓ Skip to main content

Endovascular Management of Venous Thrombotic and Occlusive Diseases of the Lower Extremities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
33 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Endovascular Management of Venous Thrombotic and Occlusive Diseases of the Lower Extremities
Published in
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, April 2003
DOI 10.1097/01.rvi.0000064849.87207.4f
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Acute complications of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities include pulmonary embolism and venous ischemia. Delayed complications include a spectrum of debilitating symptoms referred to as postthrombotic syndrome (PST). Anticoagulation therapy is recognized as the mainstay of therapy in acute DVT. However, there are few data to suggest any major beneficial effect on PTS, which is thought to be mediated by valve damage and/or occlusive chronic thrombus and venous scarring. Endovascular catheter-directed thrombolysis techniques with pharmacologic thrombolytic agents, used alone or in combination with mechanical thrombectomy devices, have been proven highly effective in clearing acute DVT, which may allow the preservation of venous valve function and prevention of subsequent venous occlusive disease. Definitive management of underlying anatomic occlusive abnormalities can also be undertaken.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 42 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 50%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2025.
All research outputs
#6,127,886
of 27,976,776 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
#1,479
of 4,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,588
of 70,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,976,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.