The dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC) is a multisubunit complex that connects the cytoskeleton of a muscle fiber to its surrounding extracellular matrix. Mutations in the DGC disrupt the complex and lead to muscular dystrophy. There are a few naturally occurring animal models of DGC-associated muscular dystrophy (e.g. the dystrophin-deficient mdx mouse, dystrophic golden retriever dog, HFMD cat and the delta-sarcoglycan-deficient BIO 14.6 cardiomyopathic hamster) that share common genetic protein abnormalities similar to those of the human disease. However, the naturally occurring animal models only partially resemble human disease. In addition, no naturally occurring mouse models associated with loss of other DGC components are available. This has encouraged the generation of genetically engineered mouse models for DGC-linked muscular dystrophy. Not only have analyses of these mice led to a significant improvement in our understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms for the development of muscular dystrophy, but they will also be immensely valuable tools for the development of novel therapeutic approaches for these incapacitating diseases.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,215,798
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
#333
of 1,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,735
of 134,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.
