| Title |
Strategies for maintaining the particle size of peptide DNA condensates following freeze-drying
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Pharmaceutics, August 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00435-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kai Y Kwok, Roger C Adami, Kelly C Hester, Youmie Park, Steve Thomas, Kevin G Rice |
| Abstract |
The particle size of peptide DNA condensates were studied after freeze-drying and rehydration as a function of sugar excipient, concentration, pH, DNA concentration, and peptide condensing agent. In the absence of an excipient, freeze-dried 50 microg/ml AlkCWK(18) (iodoacetic acid alkylated Cys-Typ-Lys(18)) DNA condensates formed large fibrous flocculates on rehydration. Of the sugars tested as lyoprotectants, sucrose proved most effective at preserving particle size during rehydration. The addition of 5 wt/vol% sucrose preserved a mean particle diameter of less than 50 nm during rehydration of AlkCWK(18) DNA condensates prepared at DNA concentrations up to 200 microg/ml; however, higher DNA concentrations led to the formation of insoluble fibrous flocculates. Substitution of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-CWK(18) as a DNA condensing peptide eliminated the need for sucrose, resulting in peptide DNA condensates that retained particle size when rehydrated in water or normal saline at concentrations up to 5 mg/ml. The results suggest that sucrose functions primarily as a bulking agent during freeze-drying that only preserves the particle size of AlkCWK(18) DNA condensates up to a maximum concentration of 200 microg/ml. Alternatively, the steric layer created on the surface of PEG-CWK(18) DNA condensates provides far more efficient lyoprotection, preserving their particle size at a concentration of 5 mg/ml without a bulking agent. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 25% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |