↓ Skip to main content

Slow calcium waves mediate furrow microtubule reorganization and germ plasm compaction in the early zebrafish embryo

Overview of attention for article published in Development (09501991), May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Slow calcium waves mediate furrow microtubule reorganization and germ plasm compaction in the early zebrafish embryo
Published in
Development (09501991), May 2018
DOI 10.1242/dev.156604
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Zebrafish germ plasm ribonucleoparticles (RNPs) become recruited to furrows of early zebrafish embryos through their association with astral microtubules ends. During the initiation of cytokinesis, microtubules are remodeled into a furrow microtubule array (FMA), thought to be analogous to the mammalian midbody involved in membrane abscission. During furrow maturation, RNPs and FMA tubules transition from their original distribution along the furrow to enrichments at the furrow distal ends, which facilitates germ plasm mass compaction. We show that nebel mutants exhibit reduced furrow-associated slow calcium waves (SCWs), caused at least in part by defective enrichment of calcium stores. RNP and FMA distal enrichment mirrors the medial-to-distal polarity of SCWs, and inhibition of calcium release or downstream mediators such as Calmodulin affects RNP and FMA distal enrichment. Blastomeres with reduced or lacking SWCs, such as early blastomeres in nebel mutants and wild-type blastomeres at later stages, exhibit medially-bundling microtubules similar to midbodies in other cell types. Our data indicates that SCWs provide medial-to-distal directionality along the furrow to facilitate germ plasm RNP enrichment at the furrow ends.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2018.
All research outputs
#22,976,605
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Development (09501991)
#9,266
of 11,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,019
of 372,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Development (09501991)
#52
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.