↓ Skip to main content

Pseudin-2: An Antimicrobial Peptide with Low Hemolytic Activity from the Skin of the Paradoxical Frog

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pseudin-2: An Antimicrobial Peptide with Low Hemolytic Activity from the Skin of the Paradoxical Frog
Published in
Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, November 2001
DOI 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5884
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Four structurally related peptides (pseudins 1-4) with antimicrobial activity were isolated from an extract of the skin of the paradoxical frog Pseudis paradoxa (Pseudidae). Pseudin-2 (GLNALKKVFQGIHEAIKLINNHVQ) was the most abundant peptide (22 nmol/g tissue) and also the most potent (minimum inhibitory concentrations, MIC = 2.5 microM against Escherichia coli, 80 microM against Staphylococcus aureus, and 130 microM against Candida albicans). The concentration of pseudin-2 producing 50% hemolysis of human erythrocytes was >300 microM. Circular dichroism studies showed that the pseudins belong to the class of cationic, amphipathic alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides but their amino acid sequences are not similar to any previously characterized peptides from frog skin. The pseudins do, however, show sequence similarity with a region at the C-terminus of DEFT, a death effector domain-containing protein expressed in mammalian testicular germ cells that is involved in the regulation of apoptosis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 2 3%
Brazil 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 63 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Chemistry 4 6%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2025.
All research outputs
#3,787,592
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#1,168
of 33,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,329
of 66,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications
#8
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.