↓ Skip to main content

Pregnancy and labor massage

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
24 X users
facebook
46 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pregnancy and labor massage
Published in
Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology, January 2014
DOI 10.1586/eog.10.12
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Massage therapy has been demonstrated to be effective during pregnancy. Women who received massage therapy reported decreased depression, anxiety, and leg and back pain. Cortisol levels decreased and, in turn, excessive fetal activity decreased, and the rate of prematurity was lower in the massage group. In a study of labor pain, women who received massage therapy experienced significantly less pain, and their labors were on average 3 h shorter with less need for medication. An underlying mechanism we have been exploring is that these effects are mediated by increased vagal activity. This likely occurs by the stimulation of pressure receptors that are innervated by vagal afferent fibers, which ultimately project to the limbic system, including hypothalamic structures involved in autonomic nervous system regulation and cortisol secretion.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 16%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 59 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 42 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 57 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#662,973
of 32,046,026 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#3
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,776
of 355,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#3
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,046,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.