↓ Skip to main content

Degenerate antigen recognition by CD4+ effector T cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroimmunology, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Degenerate antigen recognition by CD4+ effector T cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
Published in
Journal of Neuroimmunology, May 1997
DOI 10.1016/s0165-5728(97)00014-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Peptide-specific tolerance with PLP139-151 peptide analogs was used to compare the fine antigen-specificity requirements at both the inductive and effector phases of relapsing EAE (R-EAE). A PLP139-151 analog peptide containing a single substitution at the primary T cell receptor (TcR) contact residue (A144) did not induce proliferation in PLP139-151-primed CD4+ T cells. In addition, tolerance induced with ECDI-treated. A144-coupled splenocytes failed to prevent the inductive phase of PLP139-151-induced R-EAE or to inhibit the induction of peptide-specific DTH indicating that naive PLP139-151-specific T cells do not react with the A144 peptide analog. In contrast, A144-coupled splenocytes did prevent the expression of the effector phase of R-EAE and inhibited the elicitation of peptide-specific DTH responses upon administration to mice seven days after immunization with PLP139-151. The results provide in vivo evidence that "antigen-experienced' T cells recognize a broader repertoire of antigens than do naive T cells and have important implications for the regulation of immune responses and for advancing our understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of autoimmune disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2013.
All research outputs
#9,514,305
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroimmunology
#1,036
of 3,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,501
of 33,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroimmunology
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.