↓ Skip to main content

The Ecology of Arsenic

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1312 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
756 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Ecology of Arsenic
Published in
Science, May 2003
DOI 10.1126/science.1081903
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald S. Oremland, John F. Stolz

Abstract

Arsenic is a metalloid whose name conjures up images of murder. Nonetheless, certain prokaryotes use arsenic oxyanions for energy generation, either by oxidizing arsenite or by respiring arsenate. These microbes are phylogenetically diverse and occur in a wide range of habitats. Arsenic cycling may take place in the absence of oxygen and can contribute to organic matter oxidation. In aquifers, these microbial reactions may mobilize arsenic from the solid to the aqueous phase, resulting in contaminated drinking water. Here we review what is known about arsenic-metabolizing bacteria and their potential impact on speciation and mobilization of arsenic in nature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 756 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 1%
Canada 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 725 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 162 21%
Researcher 114 15%
Student > Master 107 14%
Student > Bachelor 71 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 6%
Other 130 17%
Unknown 128 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 166 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 143 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 59 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 8%
Chemistry 54 7%
Other 103 14%
Unknown 173 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,493,950
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science
#24,000
of 83,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,541
of 56,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#56
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.