↓ Skip to main content

Quorum Sensing in Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bacteriology, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents

Readers on

mendeley
787 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quorum Sensing in Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms
Published in
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2004
DOI 10.1128/jb.186.6.1838-1850.2004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Several serious diseases are caused by biofilm-associated Staphylococcus aureus, infections in which the accessory gene regulator (agr) quorum-sensing system is thought to play an important role. We studied the contribution of agr to biofilm development, and we examined agr-dependent transcription in biofilms. Under some conditions, disruption of agr expression had no discernible influence on biofilm formation, while under others it either inhibited or enhanced biofilm formation. Under those conditions where agr expression enhanced biofilm formation, biofilms of an agr signaling mutant were particularly sensitive to rifampin but not to oxacillin. Time lapse confocal scanning laser microscopy showed that, similar to the expression of an agr-independent fluorescent reporter, biofilm expression of an agr-dependent reporter was in patches within cell clusters and oscillated with time. In some cases, loss of fluorescence appeared to coincide with detachment of cells from the biofilm. Our studies indicate that the role of agr expression in biofilm development and behavior depends on environmental conditions. We also suggest that detachment of cells expressing agr from biofilms may have important clinical implications.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 787 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
India 4 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 756 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 157 20%
Student > Bachelor 115 15%
Researcher 103 13%
Student > Master 101 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 5%
Other 109 14%
Unknown 161 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 253 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 111 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 66 8%
Engineering 43 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 4%
Other 107 14%
Unknown 172 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#5,750,566
of 26,437,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bacteriology
#2,814
of 17,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,805
of 64,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bacteriology
#19
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,437,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,716 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.