↓ Skip to main content

Degradation of mechanical properties of UHMWPE acetabular liners following long-term implantation

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Arthroplasty, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Degradation of mechanical properties of UHMWPE acetabular liners following long-term implantation
Published in
The Journal of Arthroplasty, October 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00292-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that the mechanical and chemical behavior of gamma radiation-sterilized ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) changes after implantation. Relationships between the mechanical behavior and oxidation index were explored in a cohort of 16 consecutive traceable Hexloc acetabular components (Biomet, Warsaw, IN) that were machined from extruded, stearate-containing UHMWPE and gamma sterilized in air. Shelf aging time (average, 0.4 years) and implantation time (average, 11.5 years) were determined for all 16 inserts. The retrieved liners exhibited significant mechanical degradation, which was most severe in the unloaded surface regions. Analysis of the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy data revealed a significant association between the oxidation index and mechanical degradation of the UHMWPE. The results of this study strongly support the hypothesis that the degradation of mechanical properties for the liners occurred during implantation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 29%
Materials Science 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2013.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#2,316
of 5,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,667
of 63,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.