↓ Skip to main content

Roles of Cytoplasmic Arginine and Threonine in Chloride Transport by the Bacteriorhodopsin Mutant D85T

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Journal, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Roles of Cytoplasmic Arginine and Threonine in Chloride Transport by the Bacteriorhodopsin Mutant D85T
Published in
Biophysical Journal, May 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0006-3495(01)76208-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In the light-driven anion pump halorhodopsin (HR), the residues arginine 200 and threonine 203 are involved in anion release at the cytoplasmic side of the membrane. Because of large sequence homology and great structural similarities between HR and bacteriorhodopsin (BR), it has been suggested that anion translocation by HR and by the chloride-pumping BR mutant BR-D85T occurs by the same mechanism. Consequently, the functions of the R200/T203 pair in HR should be the same as those of the corresponding pair in BR-D85T (R175/T178). We have put this hypothesis to a test by creating two mutants of BR-D85T in which R175 and T178 were replaced by glutamine and valine, respectively. Chloride transport activities were essentially the same for all three mutants, whereas chloride binding and the kinetics of parts of the photocycle were markedly affected by the replacement of T178. In contrast, the consequences of mutating R175 proved to be less significant. These findings are consistent with evidence obtained on HR and therefore support the idea that the respective mechanistic roles of the cytoplasmic arginine/threonine pairs in HR and BR-D85T are equal.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Professor 3 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 39%
Chemistry 4 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,405,506
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Journal
#2,072
of 12,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,790
of 61,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Journal
#18
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.