↓ Skip to main content

Human sudomotor responses to heating and cooling upper‐body skin surfaces: cutaneous thermal sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Human sudomotor responses to heating and cooling upper‐body skin surfaces: cutaneous thermal sensitivity
Published in
Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, January 2002
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-201x.1998.00379.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The influence of local skin temperature (Tskl) on the control of local and whole-body sweating was evaluated in eight healthy males. A water-perfusion garment (37 degrees C) and a climatic chamber (36.45 +/- 0.78 degrees C; [+/- SD]; relative humidity 60.3 +/- 1.6%) were used to raise and clamp skin and core temperatures. Warm and cool stimuli were applied to four upper-body skin regions (face, arm, forearm, hand) using perfusion patches (249.0 +/- 0.2 cm2). Heating elevated, while cooling suppressed sweat rate (msw) locally, and at other skin surfaces. However, the tendency for Tskl manipulations to induce localized sweat responses was no more powerful than it was at stimulating sweating in non-treated regions (P > 0.05). Accordingly, neither thermal stimulus produced significantly greater local sudomotor influences than were elicited contralaterally (P > 0.05). No statistical support was found for the notion of inter-regional differences in upper-body cutaneous thermal sensitivity for sudomotor control, and, regardless of the stimulation site, whole-body sudomotor responses to localized thermal treatments were equivalent (P > 0.05).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 30%
Researcher 6 26%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 7 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Environmental Science 3 13%
Engineering 3 13%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,575,839
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Acta Physiologica Scandinavica
#518
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,973
of 142,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Physiologica Scandinavica
#43
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.