↓ Skip to main content

Long-term tacrine (Cognex) treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology, July 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Long-term tacrine (Cognex) treatment
Published in
Neurology, July 1996
DOI 10.1212/wnl.47.1.166
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To assess the possible association between tacrine (Cognex, manufactured by Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ) dose and likelihood of nursing home placement (NHP) or death in patients with AD. A 30-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicenter clinical trial involving 663 patients, after which patients were treated openly and followed up a minimum of 2 years later. At baseline, outpatients were at least 50 years of age, met criteria for probable AD, with baseline Mini-Mental State Examination scores between 10 and 26 (inclusive), were otherwise healthy, and had a caregiver who could provide assessments and ensure medication compliance. mandomized assignment to placebo or one of three ascending dosage regimens of tacrine over 30 weeks, followed by open label treatment for all patients who began the double-blind trial. NHP and death were examined using logistic regression. PATIENTS who remained on tacrine and were receiving doses > 80 mg/d or > 120 mg/d were less likely to have entered a nursing home than patients on lower doses (odds ratios > 2.7,2.8, respectively.) There was a trend for lower mortality for patients receiving > 120 mg/d (p = 0.063). Treatment with tacrine at doses > 80 mg/d was associated with a reduced likelihood of NHP. These data demonstrate that tacrine's 30-week effects on cognitive function and clinicians' global ratings may generalize to effects on a major milestone of AD. Future studies should attempt to replicate these findings prospectively.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Researcher 8 15%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor 5 9%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Psychology 6 11%
Neuroscience 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#10,186
of 20,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,337
of 29,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#13
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.