↓ Skip to main content

The prevalence and potential determinants of dysmenorrhoea and other pelvic pain in women: a prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The prevalence and potential determinants of dysmenorrhoea and other pelvic pain in women: a prospective study
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, May 2018
DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.15247
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To estimate the prevalence of pelvic pain, and model associations with potential demographic, obstetric, gynaecological, and psychosocial determinants. A cohort study of women born between 1972-1973 in Dunedin, New Zealand, most recently assessed when aged 38 years (95% of survivors retained); 429 women were eligible for analysis. Women self-completed reproductive health questionnaires at ages 21, 26, 32 and 38 years, with questions on dysmenorrhoea at ages 13 and 15, and on all pelvic pain at age 38. Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and Poisson regression used to model associations. The prevalence of pain and adjusted relative risks (ARR) for potential explanatory factors. Over half (54.5%, 95% CI 49.7-59.3%) of women experienced pelvic pain in the past 12 months at age 38. Dysmenorrhoea was reported by 46.2% (41.3-51.3%), dyspareunia by 11.6% (8.7-15.2%), and other pelvic pain (OPP) by 17.3% (13.8-21.2%). After adjusting for multiple factors, pregnancy (ARR 0.60, 95% CI 0.32-1.13) and childbirth (0.52, 0.25-1.09) were borderline protective for dyspareunia and OPP, respectively. However, childbirth was not associated with dysmenorrhoea (0.97, 0.74-1.28). Dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia were strongly associated, and both were associated with endometriosis. Our data confirm that female pelvic pain is common, and suggests common gynaecological and obstetric causal pathways, but there was no strong evidence supporting a benefit of childbirth for dysmenorrhoea. Further research on obstetric events and pelvic pain is needed, with both being common experiences. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Master 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 4%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 38 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 37 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,432,943
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#454
of 8,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,385
of 374,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#10
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.