↓ Skip to main content

Intragenic Spatial Patterns of Codon Usage Bias in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intragenic Spatial Patterns of Codon Usage Bias in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Genomes
Published in
Genetics, December 2004
DOI 10.1534/genetics.104.030866
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Russia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 104 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Researcher 28 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 12%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2011.
All research outputs
#6,780,480
of 31,591,940 outputs
Outputs from Genetics
#2,406
of 8,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,855
of 196,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics
#14
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,591,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.