↓ Skip to main content

Spinal muscarinic receptors are activated during low or high frequency TENS-induced antihyperalgesia in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropharmacology, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spinal muscarinic receptors are activated during low or high frequency TENS-induced antihyperalgesia in rats
Published in
Neuropharmacology, December 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0028-3908(03)00280-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-pharmacological modality used clinically to relieve pain. Central involvement of serotonin and endogenous opioids are implicated in TENS-induced analgesia. Activation of spinal cholinergic receptors is antinociceptive and these receptors interact with opioid and serotonin receptors. In the current study, the possible involvement of spinal cholinergic receptors in TENS analgesia was investigated in rats. Hyperalgesia was induced by inflaming one knee joint with 3% kaolin-carrageenan and assessed by measuring paw withdrawal latency (PWL) to heat before and 4 h after injection. The non-selective nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine (50 microg), non-selective muscarinic antagonist atropine (30 microg) or one of the muscarinic subtype antagonists: pirenzepine (M1, 10 microg), methoctramine (M2, 10 microg), 4-DAMP (M3, 10 microg), or saline was administered intrathecally just prior to TENS treatment. Low or high frequency TENS was then applied to the inflamed knee and PWL was determined again. Atropine, pirenzepine and 4-DAMP significantly attenuated the antihyperalgesic effects of low and high frequency TENS while mecamylamine and methoctramine had no effects, compared to saline control. The results show that TENS-induced antihyperalgesia is mediated partially by activation of spinal muscarinic receptors but not spinal nicotinic receptors. Further, the results also indicate that spinal M1 and M3 muscarinic receptor subtypes mediate the muscarinic component of TENS antihyperalgesia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 17%
Neuroscience 10 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neuropharmacology
#1,868
of 4,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,085
of 142,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropharmacology
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.