↓ Skip to main content

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: Basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
11 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
817 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: Basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness
Published in
Journal of Pain, April 2003
DOI 10.1054/jpai.2003.434
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 817 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 6 <1%
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 794 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 117 14%
Student > Bachelor 114 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 10%
Researcher 62 8%
Student > Postgraduate 48 6%
Other 143 18%
Unknown 255 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 202 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 104 13%
Engineering 67 8%
Neuroscience 35 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 4%
Other 98 12%
Unknown 279 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2026.
All research outputs
#2,552,544
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain
#508
of 3,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,746
of 91,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.