↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of Ferritin-Mediated Cytoplasmic Iron Storage by the Ferric Uptake Regulator Homolog (Fur) of Helicobacter pylori

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bacteriology, November 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regulation of Ferritin-Mediated Cytoplasmic Iron Storage by the Ferric Uptake Regulator Homolog (Fur) of Helicobacter pylori
Published in
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2000
DOI 10.1128/jb.182.21.5948-5953.2000
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Homologs of the ferric uptake regulator Fur and the iron storage protein ferritin play a central role in maintaining iron homeostasis in bacteria. The gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori contains an iron-induced prokaryotic ferritin (Pfr) which has been shown to be involved in protection against metal toxicity and a Fur homolog which has not been functionally characterized in H. pylori. Analysis of an isogenic fur-negative mutant revealed that H. pylori Fur is required for metal-dependent regulation of ferritin. Iron starvation, as well as medium supplementation with nickel, zinc, copper, and manganese at nontoxic concentrations, repressed synthesis of ferritin in the wild-type strain but not in the H. pylori fur mutant. Fur-mediated regulation of ferritin synthesis occurs at the mRNA level. With respect to the regulation of ferritin expression, Fur behaves like a global metal-dependent repressor which is activated under iron-restricted conditions but also responds to different metals. Downregulation of ferritin expression by Fur might secure the availability of free iron in the cytoplasm, especially if iron is scarce or titrated out by other metals.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,562,072
of 23,067,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bacteriology
#5,804
of 16,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,921
of 39,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bacteriology
#51
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,067,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.